Russia and the US are discussing a broader security settlement, while divided European leaders struggle to turn financial power into diplomatic influence<\/p>\n
On December 15, 2021, Russian President Vladimir Putin handed a list of specific proposals for a new European security architecture to then-Assistant Secretary of State Karen Donfried. This framework was meant to take Russia\u2019s interests into account. Essentially, this open letter to NATO was the last attempt to resolve issues peacefully without resorting to force. At the time, Washington ignored Russia\u2019s proposals. Just two months later, Russia started the military operation in Ukraine.
\nNow, nearly five years later, the principles of European security have unexpectedly become the key topic in negotiations between Russia and the US.
\nWhy has this happened? What role does Europe play in it? And what was the outcome of the negotiations in Abu Dhabi, which many had looked upon with skepticism?\u00a0
\nRussia and the US at the table
\nLet\u2019s start with the last question. Indeed, the talks didn\u2019t lead to any breakthroughs. The parties only agreed to a prisoner-of-war exchange. This exchange was planned, and if it hadn\u2019t taken place, it would have sparked discussions.\u00a0
\nHowever, for the first time, the talks regarding Ukraine expanded beyond Ukraine itself and touched on the underlying issues that sparked the conflict in the first place. In other words, to borrow the Kremlin\u2019s phrase, the parties finally reached the point of discussing the \u201croot causes of the conflict.\u201d<\/p>\n
Read more<\/p>\n
The Ukraine peace process has a Western European problem<\/p>\n
According to the Kremlin, the Ukraine issue can only be resolved within the context of broader agreements about the principles of future coexistence in Europe \u2013 i.e., its security architecture. To resolve this question, Moscow initiated the military operation and intends to continue it for as long as necessary since it sees no other means of achieving its goals.
\nBack in October, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated that the only unresolved issue preventing the end of the war is the territorial status of Donbass. Now, we\u2019re seeing a shift.
\nApparently, Putin has finally managed to convey his stance to the US, and the White House has accepted it. Whether it has done so sincerely is another question. Nonetheless, for the first time in five years, a proper framework for negotiations has emerged.
\nMoreover, according to several leaks, the US asked Russia to present its proposals for a future security agreement with Europe. This is similar to last year\u2019s situation, when Moscow\u2019s stance formed the basis of Trump\u2019s 28-point peace plan.
\nEurope wants a seat at the table
\nBefore the negotiations in Abu Dhabi, European representatives flatly refused to discuss the topic of European security. On November 9, President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen stated that any discussions could only take place after a ceasefire in Ukraine, essentially reiterating a position she\u2019s held for the past five years.<\/p>\n
Read more<\/p>\n
Fantasy vs. reality: Why the EU can\u2019t find its Putin envoy<\/p>\n
However, during the meeting in Abu Dhabi (from which European officials were notably excluded), a joint statement appeared on the EU website, announcing that the EU, NATO, and the UK were open to discussing a new security framework even before the conflict was resolved.
\nWhat happened? Well, European leaders seem to have realized that if they continued to dig in their heels, the question of war and peace would be decided without them. It may be humiliating for Europe to be left in the waiting room, but what\u2019s even more significant is the growing disarray within Europe itself.
\nBrussels\u2019 and Berlin\u2019s hardline stance isn\u2019t always supported even by the European mainstream. For example, we may remember how the leaders of Norway and Finland recently called Putin.
\nIf this resistance continues, peripheral EU countries may be the first to shift allegiances; eventually, the major powers will also align with the position of strength \u2013 specifically, Russia and the US \u2013 to secure whatever benefits they can.
\nThe Kremlin is well aware of this dynamic. During yesterday\u2019s meeting with Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, Putin stated that engaging with Europe only makes sense if Europe genuinely desires peace. In other words, Europe can join the negotiations on Russia\u2019s terms, and address the fundamental issues of European security together with Russia \u2013 or it can remain in the \u2018waiting room\u2019.\u00a0
\nGermany seeks funds<\/p>\n
Read more<\/p>\n
Fyodor Lukyanov: Abu Dhabi talks signal a major shift in the Ukraine peace process<\/p>\n
Currently, Germany \u2013 or rather, its ruling elite led by Chancellor Friedrich Merz\u2013 stands as the principal hawk in Europe. Merz remains steadfast in his position: Germany will accept nothing other than an immediate ceasefire and Germany will support Ukraine for as long as necessary.
\nOne might attribute this to traditional German stubbornness, but it probably goes deeper than that. Merz is desperately searching for funds to support Ukraine in the coming year. He has even threatened to block the EU budget unless all EU countries agree to finance a new solidarity loan for Kiev.\u00a0
\nLet\u2019s consider what this means. The EU budget is one of Europe\u2019s main linchpins \u2013 without cross-financing, the EU wouldn\u2019t exist; Germany itself would lose its primary tool for imposing its will on both smaller European nations and larger ones struggling under the weight of debt.
\nTherefore, the position of the hawks hinges on whether Ukraine will receive funding for the upcoming year. If they can\u2019t push through a new solidarity loan for Kiev, Germany may have to change its stance.
\nIt\u2019s hard to envision such a scenario right now. However, even from Moscow, one can see that the negotiations are proceeding with difficulty. For the sake of their success, the latest Ukrainian scandals are being swept under the rug \u2013 issues like torture prisons and the recent corruption scandal that exposed a vast drug trafficking network allegedly protected by Ukraine\u2019s top leadership.
\nMeanwhile, even a straightforward report on these matters in independent European media could provide additional, if not decisive, arguments for the growing European peace faction.<\/p>\n
Read more<\/p>\n
\u2018Carthage must be destroyed\u2019: How Ukrainian cops and criminals worked hand-in-hand<\/p>\n
Ukraine on the table
\nAside from the ongoing corruption scandals, Europe has a clear understanding of the military situation in Ukraine. It understands that the front is held with difficulty, and that there are no real prospects for success on the ground. A case in point is Operation Vivaldi, which has essentially failed and has since been forgotten.
\nUkraine\u2019s rear, including its industrial base, is being systematically dismantled by Russian forces. Ukrainian exports have plummeted, leading to a halt in critical sectors of the economy, such as metallurgy, logistics, retail, and agriculture.
\nEurope understands all too well that it will have to compensate for the lost revenues, which means it will have to give Ukraine more and more money with no end in sight.
\nThe results of the deep-strike campaign against Russia dealt a significant blow to the war faction in Europe. Earlier this spring, these strikes were touted as yet another \u201cgame changer\u201d \u2013\u00a0the idea being that with its drones, Ukraine would bring Putin to his knees and force him to accept its peace terms. This narrative helped secure the $90 billion loan for Ukraine.\u00a0
\nThe deep-strike strategy backfired, however, and now, no one in the EU is eager to give Ukraine more money. When the US proposed to hold discussions on European security, Ukraine found itself sidelined. In these negotiations, it has no voice at all; the issue will be resolved without Ukraine.<\/p>\n
Read more<\/p>\n
Putin meeting with US envoys: Key points from opening exchanges<\/p>\n
It\u2019s clear why Vladimir Zelensky is feeling anxious: he fully understands that the outcome of five years of war \u2013 resulting in the loss of a quarter of the country\u2019s territory, half the population, 80% of energy resources, 90% of metallurgy, and 60% of exports \u2013 will likely be that the \u2018big players\u2019 reach agreements without him at the table. As the saying goes, there\u2019s nothing cheaper than a service rendered.
\nWhat\u2019s next?
\nFirst, we\u2019ll have to see if Merz can secure the funding. Most likely, he will manage to do so, but it won\u2019t be easy.
\nWhen it comes to the architecture of European security, it\u2019s clear that Europe must take part in the negotiations; without its involvement, this issue cannot be resolved.
\nRecently, there has been a suggestion from the Russian side to establish non-aggression pacts with individual European countries. This could potentially serve as a solid working compromise.
\nWhen it comes to Ukraine, however, there can be no compromises. During a meeting with the US envoys at the Kremlin, Putin stated that any attempt to station foreign troops in Ukraine would lead to a resumption of the war.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Russia and the US are discussing a broader security settlement, while divided European leaders struggle to turn financial power into diplomatic influence On December 15, 2021, Russian President Vladimir Putin…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":41096,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"rop_custom_images_group":[],"rop_custom_messages_group":[],"rop_publish_now":"initial","rop_publish_now_accounts":[],"rop_publish_now_history":[],"rop_publish_now_status":"pending","footnotes":""},"categories":[4,6,3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-41095","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-economy","category-environment","category-politics"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t