Experts warn that the US plan to build an Ebola quarantine facility puts Kenya at risk<\/p>\n
On May 28, 2026, the US government announced plans to establish an Ebola quarantine facility in Kenya for its citizens exposed to the virus in the DR Congo. It was also to be used as a treatment center for Americans who contract\u00a0Ebola.
\nThe 50-bed unit was to be set up at the Laikipia Military Airbase, 125 miles Northwest of the capital, Nairobi, with the US government committing $13.5 million toward the facility\u2019s construction.
\nAlready, the US had deployed more than 30 members of the US Public Health Service to coordinate the establishment and running of the facility before the courts stopped the process. The plan, however, attracted criticism from ordinary Kenyans, politicians, human rights defenders, the doctors\u2019 union, and the country\u2019s Law Society.<\/p>\n
Read more<\/p>\n
Is the US turning Africa into a quarantine zone?<\/p>\n
On May 29, a Kenyan court issued orders stopping the construction of the US-backed facility. On June 23, Kenyan Health Minister Aden Duale was found in contempt of court for failing to comply with orders barring the government from proceeding with the construction of the controversial facility.
\nBy the time the court order was issued, construction of the controversial facility was already underway, prompting protests from locals. Hundreds of residents of Nanyuki town, where the facility was being built, poured into the streets to oppose it. Security officers used force to repulse demonstrators who were trying to reach the military installation where the construction was happening. The protesters cited fears over potential health risks associated with hosting an Ebola centre in their neighbourhood.
\n\u2018The execution plan left a lot to be desired\u2019
\nThe head of Kenya\u2019s Medical Practitioners, Pharmacists and Dentists Union, Dr. Davji Bhimji Atellah, said that \u201clack of transparency and public involvement in the establishment of the quarantine facility raised more questions than answers\u2019\u2019.
\n\u201cIf the establishment of the Ebola quarantine facility was for the good of the country, then there was no need to treat it with a lot of secrecy and confidentiality,\u201d\u00a0he told RT.
\nHe added, \u201cThe idea itself was not bad, but the execution plan left a lot to be desired\u201d.
\nAtellah wondered why the US settled on Kenya as the host of its Ebola quarantine center when the outbreak was in the DR Congo.
\n\u201cWhy not put the facility in the DR Congo, where it is needed the most. If they are afraid of exposing their own citizens to the virus, why should they put Kenyans at risk of hosting them?\u201d<\/p>\n
Read more<\/p>\n
Blood, soil, and betrayal: How British law carved up a whole country<\/p>\n
\u2018If this is not neocolonialism, then tell me what it is\u2019
\nKenyan government officials were economical with details about the plan to set up the facility, forcing civil society groups to go to court.
\nThe Katiba Institute, a civil society group focusing on constitutional matters in Kenya, went to court to stop the establishment of a quarantine facility. In its petition, the group argued that the planned facility was being established in secret and unilaterally, and that it \u201craised grave constitutional concerns\u201d.
\nJoshua Malidzo Nyawa, an Advocate acting on behalf of Katiba Institute, told the court that bringing Ebola-exposed individuals into Kenya could increase the risk of the disease spreading in the country.
\nLaw Society of Kenya President Charles Kanjama accused the US of playing double standards by pushing to have the Ebola quarantine center in Kenya despite the US having a more advanced and better-funded health system compared to the East African nation.
\n\u201cIt makes no sense that the US, with its advanced health system, is afraid of \u2018importing\u2019 the Ebola virus into its territory but wants to put Kenya at risk,\u201d\u00a0Kanjama told RT.
\nHe added, \u201cIf this is not neocolonialism, then tell me what it is\u201d.
\n\u2018Lack of transparency has raised a lot of suspicion\u2019
\nDr. Bonface Mouka, head of security, diplomacy, and peace studies at Kenyatta University, argues that it is hard to ignore the question of sovereignty whenever a foreign government supports such a critical infrastructure in another country.<\/p>\n
Read more<\/p>\n
There is a country where the British army has retained impunity for years. Soldiers use it to escape their crimes<\/p>\n
\u201cThe question of who controls such a facility and how he does it definitely ignites the debate on sovereignty. The lack of clarity on legal oversights of such agreements only erodes public confidence. Lack of transparency has raised a lot of suspicion and quickly transformed a public health initiative into a source of political controversy,\u201d Mouka told RT.
\nAccording to Mouka, the global strengthening of disease surveillance and response capabilities through cross-border collaborations is a strategic imperative, but the public good must guide such agreements.
\nHe added that the world learned vital lessons from the Covid-19 pandemic, which demonstrated that health emergencies can rapidly evolve into national security crises with economic and social consequences.
\n\u201cAs much as the Ebola quarantine facility agreement between Kenya and the US was a good idea, it must be embedded within Kenya\u2019s own national security and public health frameworks. Anything outside that becomes a security concern,\u201d\u00a0he noted.
\n\u2018Total disregard for sovereignty\u2019
\nMariah Muli, an associate fellow on global security and diplomacy at the Horn Institute, argues that global health has become an important component of diplomacy and security cooperation and that the US can use investments in health preparedness to strengthen bilateral relations.
\n\u201cThe United States views Kenya as a strategic partner in the region, and such investments are expected as part of bilateral relations. Partnerships are good, but when they are shrouded in secrecy, they become more of a one-sided affair,\u201d\u00a0Muli said.
\nShe told RT that in the Ebola quarantine facility case, \u201cthe US seemed to be dictating to Kenya on what to do, in total disregard for its sovereignty\u201d.\u00a0
\n\u201cIt appears a call was made, and Kenya was told that the facility must be set up on US conditions and there was no room for asking questions or opposing,\u201d Muli suggests.<\/p>\n
Read more<\/p>\n
The TikTok insurrection: How young Africa is dismantling the French narrative<\/p>\n
Muli told RT that the controversy surrounding the proposed facility offered an important lesson for future bilateral engagements between Kenya and its partners.
\n\u201cGlobal health cooperation is necessary in an interconnected world, and Kenya stands to benefit from strategic partnerships in epidemic preparedness and response. But any arrangement that appears to sidestep public participation or compromise national sovereignty is bound to face resistance, regardless of its intended benefits,\u201d she concluded.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Experts warn that the US plan to build an Ebola quarantine facility puts Kenya at risk On May 28, 2026, the US government announced plans to establish an Ebola quarantine…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":36981,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"rop_custom_images_group":[],"rop_custom_messages_group":[],"rop_publish_now":"initial","rop_publish_now_accounts":[],"rop_publish_now_history":[],"rop_publish_now_status":"pending","footnotes":""},"categories":[4,6,3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-36980","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-economy","category-environment","category-politics"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t