Once the architect of balance, Washington is now sidelined as West Jerusalem, Ankara, and Riyadh shape the future of the region<\/p>\n
On September 9, 2025, Israel carried out an airstrike on a Hamas-linked compound in Doha. The attack landed like a thunderclap: it was the first time Israel had struck inside Qatar,\u00a0home to Al-Udeid Air Base \u2013 the largest US military facility in the region and a cornerstone of Washington\u2019s posture in the Middle East.
\nThe strike exposed the contradictions of America\u2019s regional strategy. For decades, Washington positioned itself as the guarantor of balance in the Middle East. But Israel\u2019s decision to act unilaterally, in the heart of an American ally, has shaken that framework and raised the question: is US influence in the region slipping away?
\nThe incident and its fallout
\nWithin hours of the Israeli strike, US President Donald Trump distanced himself from the decision. On his Truth Social account, he\u00a0wrote:
\n\u201cThis was a decision made by Prime Minister Netanyahu, it was not a decision made by me. Unilaterally bombing inside Qatar, a sovereign nation and close ally of the United States \u2026 does not advance Israel or America\u2019s goals.\u201d
\nIt was a rare public rebuke of an Israeli action by a sitting US president \u2013 and a telling sign of the strain between Washington and West Jerusalem. Trump\u2019s words revealed two things at once: America\u2019s desire to preserve its Gulf alliances and the perception that Israel is increasingly willing to act alone, even at the expense of its patron.<\/p>\n
US President Donald Trump.<\/p>\n
\u00a9\u00a0 Justin Sullivan\/Getty Images <\/p>\n
The United Nations was quick to sound the alarm. Rosemary DiCarlo, the UN\u2019s chief political affairs officer,\u00a0called the attack an \u201calarming escalation\u201d that risked opening \u201ca new and perilous chapter in this devastating conflict.\u201d
\nThe choice of target made the shock even greater. Qatar is not a marginal actor: it is home to Al-Udeid Air Base, the hub of US air operations across the region.\u00a0
\nBefore his departure, former US Secretary of State Antony Blinken had\u00a0warned on January 14, 2025 that the American empire had to do everything to maintain a favorable order in the region and that the Israeli-Palestinian conflict was the key: \u201cWe continue to believe the best way to create a more stable, secure, and prosperous Middle East is through forging a more integrated region. The key to achieving that integration now, more than ever, is ending this conflict in a way that realizes the long-standing aspirations of both Israelis and Palestinians.\u201d<\/p>\n
Read more<\/p>\n
After Israel\u2019s strike on Doha, is Moscow the last mediator?<\/p>\n
By striking in Doha, Israel hit at the very heart of America\u2019s military footprint \u2013 and fueled doubts among Arab partners about Washington\u2019s ability to keep its closest ally in check.\u00a0
\nA fragile balance built over decades
\nFor half a century, US policy in the Middle East has rested on a delicate balance. After the Yom Kippur War in 1973, Washington stepped in as the region\u2019s chief arbiter, eventually brokering the Camp David Accords in 1979 that ended the state of war between Israel and Egypt. That deal broke the united Arab front against Israel and cemented America\u2019s role as guarantor of a fragile order.
\nThe post-9\/11 wars redrew the map again. The invasion of Iraq toppled a longstanding adversary of Israel, but also unleashed new instability that Iran was quick to exploit through proxies such as Hezbollah and Hamas. The Arab Spring in 2011 further destabilized regimes, creating openings for Tehran to expand its influence.
\nBy the late 2010s, Washington\u2019s strategy had evolved into a tacit alignment with Israel and the Sunni Gulf monarchies against the so-called \u201caxis of resistance\u201d led by Iran. The Abraham Accords of 2020 sought to formalize this alignment, bringing Israel into open relations with the UAE, Bahrain, Morocco, and Sudan, and nudging Saudi Arabia toward eventual normalization.
\nHowever, that framework began to unravel after the Hamas assault of October 7, 2023. Two years of war in Gaza froze the normalization process and forced Arab leaders to put the Palestinian issue back at the center of their politics. What was meant to be a stable order anchored by US leadership now looks increasingly brittle.<\/p>\n
FILE PHOTO. Israeli forces get prepared before entering the Gaza Strip for an attack in Nahal Oz, Israel on December 12, 2023.<\/p>\n
\u00a9\u00a0 Mostafa Alkharouf\/Anadolu via Getty Images <\/p>\n
New regional hegemon
\nDespite the political costs of the Gaza war, Israel has accumulated significant military gains in recent years. Its intelligence services have decimated Hezbollah\u2019s leadership in Lebanon, weakening the group\u2019s standing both militarily and politically.
\nIn Syria, Israeli support for cross-border operations have expanded a buffer zone in the south since the collapse of Assad\u2019s government. In Iran, precision strikes and covert assassinations have damaged nuclear facilities and eliminated key scientific and military personnel.
\nThe result is a Middle East where Israel faces no immediate rival of comparable strength. That perception alarms regional players, especially Saudi Arabia and T\u00fcrkiye, which see Israeli actions in Syria and the West Bank as destabilizing. From backing Druze separatists in southern Syria to pursuing annexation in the West Bank, West Jerusalem increasingly projects the image of a state willing to expand its footprint at any cost.
\nTurkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan captured this sentiment during the Organization of Islamic Cooperation summit in Doha on September 15, 2025. \u201cWe recently see some arrogant sham politicians in Israel frequently repeating the \u2018Greater Israel\u2019 delusions,\u201d he\u00a0warned. \u201cIsrael\u2019s efforts to expand its occupations in neighboring countries are each a concrete manifestation of this goal.\u201d<\/p>\n
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdo\u011fan.<\/p>\n
\u00a9\u00a0 Yavuz Ozden\/ dia images via Getty Images <\/p>\n
The Gulf and T\u00fcrkiye\u2019s strategic dilemma
\nFor the Gulf monarchies, Israel\u2019s growing military weight is a double-edged sword. Riyadh worries that any annexation of parts of the West Bank could displace Palestinian groups hostile to the monarchy and destabilize Jordan \u2013 its vital buffer state, which has been shaken in the past by uprisings and civil war.
\nT\u00fcrkiye has its own concerns. Ankara views Israeli ambitions in Syria as a direct challenge to its post-conflict reconstruction plans, which extend to Qatar and the broader zone of former Ottoman influence.<\/p>\n
Read more<\/p>\n
On your knees: This EU move has just revealed the scale of its insignificance<\/p>\n
These overlapping fears are already driving new alignments. Qatar is moving closer to T\u00fcrkiye and redoubling its role in Syrian stabilization. Saudi Arabia has turned to Pakistan, sealing a mutual defense pact on September 17, 2025, as a hedge against Israeli power. Egypt, for its part, has\u00a0called for the creation of an \u201cArab NATO,\u201d positioning itself as a potential security anchor.
\nThe political fallout is equally sharp. On September 15, 2025, an extraordinary joint summit of the Arab League and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation urged all states to take \u201call possible legal and effective measures\u201d against Israel, including reviewing diplomatic and economic relations. Yet on the very same day, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio was in Israel,\u00a0pledging America\u2019s \u201cunwavering support\u201d for its campaign to eradicate Hamas.
\nAs political scientist Ziad Majed\u00a0put it, \u201cWith the September 9 attack in Qatar, Israel is clearly indicating that it no longer sets a red line in the pursuit of Hamas leaders. The Gulf states may seek to no longer be so dependent on the Americans.\u201d<\/p>\n
Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi makes a speech during the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation – Arab League Extraordinary Summit on September 15, 2025 in Doha, Qatar.<\/p>\n
\u00a9\u00a0 Ercin Erturk\/Anadolu via Getty Images <\/p>\n
Scenarios for the decade ahead
\nLooking toward 2030, three possible trajectories stand out for the Middle East.
\nThe first is a shift toward regional multipolarity, in which the Gulf states and T\u00fcrkiye build their own security architectures with less reliance on Washington. That path would increase the risk of fragmentation and flare-ups, but it also reflects a reality already taking shape: power in the region is no longer centered on the United States, but shared among ambitious local players.
\nThe second scenario is a forced US re-engagement. Washington could try to rein in Israel by attaching conditions to military aid, while tightening ties with the Gulf monarchies. Such a move would require a painful realignment of America\u2019s strategic focus at a time when the Indo-Pacific remains its top priority.<\/p>\n
Read more<\/p>\n
Missiles don\u2019t lie: What this region\u2019s rocket stockpiles say about the next war<\/p>\n
The third is a hybrid and unstable order, with Israel, Saudi Arabia, and T\u00fcrkiye emerging as the three dominant military poles under intermittent US oversight. That arrangement would be fraught with rivalries and could open the door to outside powers like Russia and China, adding another layer of instability \u2013 much as Syria has illustrated since 2011.
\nThe end of an era
\nThe strike in Doha crystallized a larger truth: Washington is no longer the unquestioned guarantor of order in the Middle East. Israel\u2019s growing autonomy, Saudi Arabia\u2019s strategic awakening, T\u00fcrkiye\u2019s regional ambitions, and Iran\u2019s resilience are reshaping the balance of power in ways the United States can no longer fully control.
\nAmerican support for Israel remains official policy, but it has become a source of friction with Arab and Turkish partners. The region is drifting toward a multipolar order defined less by global powers than by local actors \u2013 a landscape of shifting alliances, unpredictable escalations, and fragile balances.
\nThe unipolar moment has passed. What comes next will be decided not in Washington, but in the capitals of the Middle East itself.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Once the architect of balance, Washington is now sidelined as West Jerusalem, Ankara, and Riyadh shape the future of the region On September 9, 2025, Israel carried out an airstrike…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":18472,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"rop_custom_images_group":[],"rop_custom_messages_group":[],"rop_publish_now":"initial","rop_publish_now_accounts":[],"rop_publish_now_history":[],"rop_publish_now_status":"pending","footnotes":""},"categories":[4,6,3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-18471","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-economy","category-environment","category-politics"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t